Multi-Objective Optimization of Smart Sustainable Manufacturing Using Hybrid Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Comparative Computational Study
Keywords:
smart manufacturing, sustainable manufacturing, machine learning, metaheuristics, NSGA-II, digital twin, predictive maintenance, multi-objective optimization, Industry 5.0.Abstract
Manufacturers must increasingly optimize throughput, energy, emissions, quality, reliability, and worker-centered constraints at the same time. Machine learning (ML) predicts complex system behavior, while metaheuristics search large, discontinuous, and multi-objective decision spaces; their hybridization can therefore connect perception with action. This article synthesizes exactly 20 recent and authoritative sources - 11 peer-reviewed studies, five institutional or standards-based sources, and four official company cases - and develops a reproducible analytical demonstrator. The computational study represents a synthetic cell with 30 jobs, six heterogeneous machines, three eligible machines per job, three operating modes, time-varying carbon intensity, and machine-health effects. A scalar genetic algorithm (GA), NSGA-II, and an Extra-Trees-assisted NSGA-II were compared over eight independent runs under an equal budget of 396 exact simulator evaluations. The hybrid screened four times as many candidate offspring while retaining 15% random exploration and exactly re-evaluating every selected candidate. Its mean weighted compromise score was 0.977, compared with 0.990 for plain NSGA-II and 0.989 for GA; the paired hybrid-versus-NSGA-II score difference was significant (Wilcoxon p = 0.039). Relative to energy-aware list dispatch, the selected hybrid operating point reduced electricity by 6.13%, modeled CO2 by 5.42%, and quality/reliability risk by 10.47%, while increasing risk-adjusted makespan by 5.10%. These are model results, not plant claims. The evidence and demonstrator jointly indicate that hybrid methods are most valuable when evaluations are expensive, objectives conflict, and decisions must adapt to changing production conditions. Their responsible industrial use requires exact feasibility checks, model-drift monitoring, lifecycle-aware sustainability accounting, human approval for consequential actions, and governance aligned with manufacturing standards.
References
[1] International Energy Agency, Energy Efficiency 2024. Paris, France: IEA, 2024. Available: official source page
[2] European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. Available: official source page
[3] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 23247-1:2021, Automation Systems and Integration - Digital Twin Framework for Manufacturing - Part 1: Overview and General Principles. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2021. Available: official source page
[4] E. Tabassi, Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2023. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
[5] R. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Liu, K. Su, H. Ishibuchi, and Y. Jin, 'Synergistic integration of metaheuristics and machine learning: latest advances and emerging trends,' Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, art. 268, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-025-11266-y
[6] C. Chen, H. Fu, Y. Zheng, F. Tao, and Y. Liu, 'The advance of digital twin for predictive maintenance: The role and function of machine learning,' Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 71, pp. 581-594, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.010
[7] H. D. Shoorkand, M. Nourelfath, and A. Hajji, 'A hybrid deep learning approach to integrate predictive maintenance and production planning for multi-state systems,' Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 74, pp. 397-410, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.04.005
[8] A. Billey and T. Wuest, 'Energy digital twins in smart manufacturing systems: A case study,' Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 88, art. 102729, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102729
[9] B. Ha, H. Lee, and S. Hwangbo, 'Towards sustainable energy efficiency: Data-driven optimization in large-scale plants using machine learning applications,' Energy, vol. 331, art. 137059, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137059
[10] J. Yang, F. Wang, Y. Dun, et al., 'Prediction-based multi-objective optimization method for 3D printing resource consumption,' The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 134, pp. 1805-1843, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-024-14143-0
[11] A.-T. Nguyen, V.-H. Nguyen, T.-T. Le, and N.-T. Nguyen, 'A hybridization of machine learning and NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and cutting force in AISI 4340 alloy steel turning,' Journal of Machine Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 133-153, 2023. DOI: 10.36897/jme/160172
[12] V.-H. Nguyen, T.-T. Le, M.-V. Le, H.-D. Minh, and A.-T. Nguyen, 'Multi-objective optimization based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for surface roughness and tool wear in Ti6Al4V turning,' Machining Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 380-421, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2023.2235610
[13] Y. Hu, L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and Q. Tang, 'Matheuristic and learning-oriented multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for energy-aware flexible assembly job shop scheduling problem,' Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 133, art. 108634, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108634
[14] X. Chang, X. Jia, and J. Ren, 'A reinforcement learning enhanced memetic algorithm for multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling toward Industry 5.0,' International Journal of Production Research, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 119-147, 2025. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2357740
[15] W. Zhang, Y. Zheng, and R. Ahmad, 'An energy-efficient multi-objective scheduling for flexible job-shop-type remanufacturing system,' Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 66, pp. 211-232, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.008
[16] World Economic Forum, Global Lighthouse Network: The Mindset Shifts Driving Impact and Scale in Digital Transformation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2025. Available: official source page
[17] Siemens, 'Siemens factory in Erlangen named Digital Lighthouse Factory,' Oct. 17, 2024. Available: official source page
[18] Schneider Electric, 'World Economic Forum recognizes Schneider Electric Shanghai, China and Monterrey, Mexico factories as new Lighthouses,' Oct. 7, 2024. Available: official source page
[19] Robert Bosch GmbH, 'The Bosch Shopfloor Agent: Artificial intelligence for competitive factories,' in Bosch Annual Report 2025, 2026. Available: official source page
[20] BMW Group, 'How AI is revolutionising production,' Nov. 27, 2023. Available: official source page
[21] Abdulgader Alsharif, Abdussalam Ali Ahmed, Omar Ahmed Mohamed, & Taha Muftah Abuali. (2026). Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches for Accurate Solar Energy Forecasting from Real-World Weather Data. Libyan Journal of Health, Science, and Development (LJHSD), 2(1), 09-17. https://ljhsd.org.ly/index.php/ljhsd/article/view/10
[22] Optimizing Efficiency: A Comprehensive Overview of Lean Manufacturing Techniques and Their Impact on Industry. (2025). مجلة الباحث للعلوم التطبيقية, 4(1), 18-27. https://albahitjas.com.ly/index.php/albahit/article/view/39


